Wednesday, 1 July 2026
"Supergirl" - Helen Sleater-Kinney
(Credit: Kino Check)
The script is ropey, and definitely could have used some work, with the movie feeling a tad flabby as well as undercooked, like a half-stretched spaghetti. But the building blocks are there, and the central performance of Alcock as the jaded, cynical, absolute disaster of a lead with a heart of gold is a winning one, and the film breezes along nicely enough under Gillespie's direction: he's a director I like ("I, Tonya" rules), and the tone mostly works. Its framework is a solid one, and I enjoyed the setting (particularly the cute space bus and grimy, dingy diners, it was fun) and the buddy-cop set up is simple and clear enough to not only follow, but sets it apart from "Superman" (though the excellent Corenswet shows up to remind us that he too is perfect in this part). The villain is dog rough: functional for the plot, but otherwise an empty vessel and bland charicature despite much sneering and snarling from Schoenaerts, who gives him the quirk of constantly snacking to try and make him pop. The themes could use some development and focus.
However, the whole thing is amiable and good fun, and there is a wonderful use of Jimmy Eat World in a fight towards the end (tailor made for me: I adore that song), with an also excellent, soulful, actually pretty powerful performance from David Krumholtz: though I am getting old enough to see the kid from "Numb3rs" and "Addams Family Values" playing dads now, and that scares me...
It's fun, breezy, and a good time. I refuse to engage in bad faith "takedowns" of the film, it's a solid enough work with its own problems, and that I have to clarify that is a sign of how disgusting the poisoned well of discourse has become.
I look forward to more Milly Alcock, she's excellent.
Monday, 14 July 2025
"Superman: Legacy" - Review
The movie is a good fun, a throwback to the bright, garish, colourful Saturday morning cartoons one grew up with and would associate with Superman, and in a good way it feels like those old movies and shows designed to sell toys: Lex Luthor has a detachable spaceship in his tower, there's a revolving crystal fortress, eclectic superhero trio "The Justice Gang" do battle with intergalactic imps in the background, etc. We get things like Superman discussing things with a rather excellent Lois Lane (Rachel Brosnahan) illuminated by a battle between a neon "Dimensional Imp" and the "Justice Gang" in the night skies behind him, pretty stuff and all good fun. There's even that cute little quirk/trademark of Gunn's where he has a character (here Edi Gathegi's "Mr Terrific", a character I was unfamiliar with, showcasing Gunn's wonderful nerdy love of comic books, and here played as a genius done with life and the bullshit of idiots around him) do a creatively done fight scene well-shot, to a pop song you've not heard in years (though here the song's one I don't really like, so... great job there), and Gunn embraces the weird stuff. It feels, in some regards, very much a "Gunn Film" - harking back to his "Guardians of the Galaxy" trilogy and, to a lesser extent, "The Suicide Squad", what with its bright colours and garish pastels and overwhelming sense of anarchic glee.
The character work is strong across the board, always a strength of Gunn's:
Corenswet is endearing, wonderfully cast as Superman: he's a big joyful good boy trying to do his best, and going out of his way to save squirrels and little girls so they don't get squished in his monster battles, he dives in headfirst to resue his asshole dog (a highlight of the film, and set to become a fan favourite. Because of course he is: it's Krypto!) because "he's scared and alone". He's a great Superman, what you think about when you think of the character.
Rachel Brosnahan (fantastic name) is also marvellous as Lois Lane: she's integral to the plot, investigating and poking and solving things whilst Superman does the smashing, yet also questioning him and forcing him to confront his own actions and morality (there's a bloody excellet scene of a mockup interview between the two of them), and is not merely relegated to doe-eyed love interest or sassy quip machine, I enjoyed her very much. Her sugar scene was nice.
Nicholas Hoult was one of my favourites going in, one of the most interesting actors working today, and his Lex Luthor is suitably cartoonish, over the top, grandiose, arrogant, and a foil for all that is good in the world. He gets an excellent scene where Superman tears through his office like a hurricane and he is unfazed, and a great speech at the end about his grandiose desire for attention, humanity's need to innovate, and why he despises Superman. Lex Luthor is not "relatable": he's a billionaire who despises a man for being good. I'll save the scholarly examinatons of Superman and Lex Luthor and how they relate to current events for other blogs.
As is par for the course with Gunn: we get excellent character work even in the smaller parts, again proving the adage that there are no small parts, only small actors. Skyler Gisondo (another actor I was excited to se cast, he's great in "Santa Clarita Diet" and yet another arrow in the quiver of "Everything Gets Better if you Cast from the Booksmart Cast") is a delightfully cast Jimmy Olson, played here as a complete pussy magnet and a joy to watch, who weaves into the plot masterfully. On a similar note is Sara Sampaio (I appreciate that Gunn focuses on talent rather than names) as Luthor's selfie-obsessed girlfriend Eve, who kind of stole the show for me and got a brilliant payoff to her writing, making her more than a gag character: pictured here imprinting herself in my brain and heart forever:
Nathan Fillion shows up as Guy Gardner and nails it, the ever-wonderful Isabela Merced shows up (side note: her "Dora the Explorer" is still an all time favourite performance) for about 5 minutes as Hawkgirl and whilst I was gutted her dialogue was not entirely screeching and feral screaming she was good fun.
It's a breezy ride.
Unfortunately it is also a ride of one central paradox: it's simultaneously not James Gunn enough, whilst being too James Gunn.
I've followed Gunn's work since the start: I love "Tromeo and Juliet" and maintain "Super" is the best superhero movie ever made, hell I had him respond to me on Facebook about "The Specials" years ago. I've been in his corner forever, and so beyond happy to see him come so far and do well. He loves films, making them and creating in general. But "Superman" has been somewhat neutered of 2 of things which made him great: the anarchic blood and guts DIY filmmaking and chaos bred from the Troma mines (the CGI and backdrops and gleaming things all seem to blur together after a while), and his attention to leting emotional beats land by weaving the darkness and sorrow into the proceedings (here the characters are a tad glib and cartoony, which whilst fun does undercut it all a bit). I'm not an idiot: I'm not asking for "Superman" to be a bloodbath. The movie's constant clamouring for activity and action and fun and hijinks and jokes is never on the scale of a Marvel production (though there is a forced and somewhat excruciating joke about a Harem which feels too forced for my tastes), but it does mean that the emotional beats don't get as much of a chance to breathe. I was missing that soaring emotional high I wanted from it all in favour of fun, and it felt more like a James Gunn movie than a Superman movie in some of its dialogue, but never enough to be quite subversive. The touches were there (an alien baby so ugly it became adorable, a gang of oddballs, hints at body horror with the character of The Engineer) but pulled back a little too much. It's a good intro, and I look forward to when it can breathe properly and spread its wings.
It does well as a blockbuster and breezy fun time, its tone is all over the place, and it's a wild and crazy time. But despite my flaws and ranking of it in the middle of Gunn's ouvre (below "Super" and above "Slither"), the central messages are still good: kindness is decent, billionaires and corporations are bad, and we should (and can) all strive to be better people by remembering what makes us human. There's a lot to love, maybe too much, but it has Frank Grillo and a cameo from the golf club wielding Flo from "The Suicide Squad" too, so endeared itself to me.
Saturday, 5 February 2022
"Batman VS Superman: Dawn of Justice" Review - From the Vaults
"Man of Steel 2: Electric Boogaloo" is not a good movie.
| Let me have the easy jokes, please! |
This is frustrating, as there is a good Ben Affleck fascist-vigilante movie in there somewhere, but it remains distant, mired by crap, like me trying to watch pornography when I haven't cleaned my glasses.
It suffers from all of the same problems which plagued the first one, only now it is a clusterfuck written (though I hesitate to use that word, more on that presently) by a fanboy, which serves only to make it insufferably smug about itself.
There is no plot, only things which happen. Yes, Fanwank Man does battle with Henry Cavill, but you have to sit through two hours of awful dialogue riddled with such heavy and blunt metaphors and clunky "wacky" references (such as Alfred referring to Batman as "A Phantasm") that when this tiny, almost inconsequential fight finally happens (though, not as a result of two characters, for there are no such things in this move, growing to hate each other and having at it, but as a result of some convoluted idiot scheme by a character I will get to momentarily) not even Ben Affleck hitting a man with a sink and delivering some of the few good lines of the movie can save it. Besides which, there is a tacked on fight with a cross between Tim Roth from "Incredible Hulk" and the alien from "Prometheus" at the end which also pads out the run time even further, in between enormous plot holes, contrivances and a complete lack of characters, arcs and any semblance of plot.
The film is like a comic book fan has taken the "coolest" panels from the few "serious" comics which are not downright embarrassing and mashed them together in an AMV whilst simultaneously trying to remake "Watchman", particularly ironic considering the director. I am pretty sure that Snyder has gone insane and believes that Rorschach and Dr Manhattan ARE Superman and Batman, as well as the fact that he can make good movies besides "Watchmen".
The movie is dull, overlong and anemic in equal measure, but the biggest, most annoyingly glaring flaw (besides the whiplash inducing editing and fight sequences and fan wank) is, unfortunately, one of the few things I had been looking forward to:
| Zach Snyder and his "Snyderverse" - Colourised. Of course I'm joking: he wouldn't let non-white people do stuff |
Jessie Eisenberg brings something to the table, in that he tries to add colour to the screen. Unfortunately, he was told to play it as Heath Ledger's "Joker", when he was meant to be playing Lex fucking Luthor. Every line from his mouth, every tic, every jolting, jerky movement and strange "eccentricity" he does are like chalkboards having fingernails dragged across them. The film grinds to a fucking halt whenever he appears on screen, which is a shame, as the character of Lex Luthor is a great one ripe for flamboyance, exploration and depth, and Eisenberg is a great actor. Unfortunately the corpse of Michael Shannon manages to be more intimidating as a villain than he does, and Tao Okamoto (who has three lines and is murdered brutally an hour in) is more interesting and threatening than he is, and also seems far more enigmatic and clever. She and other amazing actors are completely wasted. Heck, it was only when I read the credits that I realised Patrick Wilson and Carla Gugino were in this. Diane Lane and Holly Hunter are incredible actresses, also totally wasted here (though Diane Lane still manages to carry herself with dignity, grace and pathos in a movie like this, Hunter is given virtually nothing to work with and still does her best) in favor of a grimy filter in place of us actually caring, or any real "Darkness."
However, there is one thing which sums up the cynical, horrible, pugnaciously repellent nature of a film this sneering in its contempt for the audience and the concept of fun and joy:
Senator Patrick Leahy has had a cameo in pretty much every Batman movie ever made. He is an old man who simply loves Batman and comic books, who always donates his fee to charity and is simply delighted to be there when Batman movies are made. Indeed, he has a cameo in this one (which I was searching for throughout) as a senator at the hearing alongside Holly Hunter. When this lovable old man who has nothing but love for the character showed up, I was happy, as he'd been given a cameo once again.
Then he was blown up, alongside Holly Hunter and Tao Okamoto, brutally, quickly and without any remorse. He was the last remnant of joy, a symbol of the love people have for a character or a medium and how it brings people together, and it was destroyed in a quest for "darkness", "gravitas" and "gritty realism".
Fuck off, Snyder.




